Dem Declares “Call To Arms” Against Supreme Court

Elon Musk’s managerial takeover of Twitter can’t come soon enough, especially in light of the rather disturbing “call to arms” literally just issued by none other than the perpetually enraged, openly racist mayor of crime-ridden Chicago.

That’s right: Lori Lightfoot, who recently made headlines for refusing to interview with any journalist who didn’t identify as a person of “color,” apparently thinks it’s just fine for people to openly execute individuals who hold opinions they don’t agree with.

In particular conservative individuals.

In fact, she’s openly encouraging it, per her own Twitter account.

Ms. Lightfoot, who has bizarrely conflated the current Supreme Court debate on Roe v. Wade with some alleged attack on LGBTQ+ “rights,” apparently perceives her false conflation as a justification for literally bearing arms … against the Supreme Court.

“To my friends in the LGBTQ+ community – the Supreme Court is coming for us next. This moment has to be a call to arms. We will not surrender our rights without a fight – a fight to victory!” Lightfoot roared on Twitter.

Hm. Strange commentary for a mayor that seemed otherwise opposed to gun violence.

No wonder Chicago is filled with endless murders. The mayor openly calls for it.

And apparently lacks even a modicum of awareness, though she’s given a constant pass by the press for checking off at least three different “inclusion” checkboxes.

“We will fight like hell to protect reproductive freedom for women here and across the country!” Lightfoot added, as if the “call to arms” wasn’t sufficient enough.

Looks like at least a few “peaceful protestors” have taken Ms. Lightfoot’s call seriously, or would certainly use it as justification for their heinous actions.

In Virginia, Lightfoot clearly got what she was calling for, specifically when a bullet hole was discovered in the office of Attorney General Jason Miyares.

On Tuesday evening, Public Information Officer Joe Macenka informed The Daily Wire that “Capitol Police were called to the Barbara Johns Building at 7:13 p.m. Monday for a report of a bullet that may have been fired into the building from outside. Officers found a bullet in a sixth-floor office that also had a small round hole near the top of a window.”

Lo and behold, Miyares apparently committed the crime of telling protestors to not harass individuals attending Catholic Mass.

“I deeply respect the First Amendment rights of speech and assembly. But no one has the right to interfere with the fundamental and natural right of all Virginians to practice their religion in peace,” Miyares remarked over the weekend, “[however], the civil rights of Virginia’s worshipers will not be violated by any mobs. In Virginia, the law reigns supreme and Catholic Virginians’ right to worship in peace will be protected.”

Miyares openly spoke out against the disinformation board, declaring that it “is an unacceptable and downright alarming encroachment on every citizen’s right to express his or her opinions, engage in political debate, and disagree with the government.”

Within days of Miyares’ remarks, his office is literally shot at.

Just like Lightfoot called for, in her own Twitter feed.

One would think the White House might, just might, put the left in its place.

Alas, Press Secretary Psaki apparently believes that “women’s rights” are more important than conservatives’ physical life.

“I don’t have an official U.S. Government position on where people protest,” White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki sneered.

Of course she doesn’t. She doesn’t have an official position on anything of substance, as she is one of the most obviously bought and paid for press secretaries of all time.

Not to mention one of the most spoiled, as she can scrutinize reporters’ questions and make (poor) Cliff’s Notes in advance.

How she can look in the mirror at night is beyond anyone’s comprehension, especially since she all but implicitly supported aggressive protests against the justices for daring to do what they were appointed to do: interpret the Constitution.

“I want it – we want it of course to be peaceful,” the undereducated press secretary continued unsteadily.

Almost as if she is unsure as to whether or not she’s supposed to even advocate peace anymore, as she sure as heck doesn’t advocate free speech.

Guess she may have briefly veered off script, which means her uncertainty over whether or not protests should remain peaceful is all the more authentic.

To be fair, however, she openly supported BLM-backed violent, murderous mobs who besieged businesses and private residences.

So, no wonder she has no idea what a “peaceful protest” truly is, never mind the importance of it.

This uncertainty is all the more evident when considering how suddenly forthright she was regarding the “fundamental rights” of women, wherein she didn’t stammer at all.

“I think we shouldn’t lose the point here: The reason people are protesting is because women across the country are worried about their fundamental rights that have been law for 50 years,” Psaki added forcefully, abruptly reverting back to her prewritten, psychopathic script.
Amazing how Democrats can suddenly define “woman” when it suits them.

“Their rights to make choices about their own bodies and their own health care are at risk,” she sneered, “that’s why people are protesting – they’re unhappy, they’re scared.”

Ah. The good old “feelings” argument.

Her lack of education is showing … not to mention a complete absence of mental acuity in any context.

Real shame that the “feelings” of mobs are more important than the physical life of (conservative) Supreme Court Justices.

Author: Ofelia Thornton


Most Popular

These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More



Most Popular
Sponsored Content

These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More