Recently, Governor Gavin Newsom announced that California has seized more than one million fentanyl pills … nearly 600,000 of which were at “the state’s point of entry.”
“Our increased California National Guard deployment helped federal partners seize over half a million fentanyl pills at the southern border last month. We’re doing our job, while Republicans in Congress drop the ball and block the bipartisan border security deal that would further crack down on fentanyl trafficking. They continue to choose chaos for political gain over the American people,” Newsom insisted.
Is that so, Newsom? How serious about “border security” can he be when he is well aware of millions of illegals present in his state alone?
The Los Angeles Times also ran a rather troubling headline regarding the state of California, specifically with regards to the massive presence of narcotics in the state.
Courtesy of Biden’s buddies in Beijing, delivered via their subordinate cartels in Mexico.
Seems like Beijing has already been attacking Americans with impunity, courtesy of all the China-originated drugs flowing across the border.
What a system.
And that system has led to a shocking admission by the Los Angeles Times.
Apparently, at least 62,000 pounds of fentanyl were seized across the state in 2023 alone.
That’s right: pounds.
And, accordingly to epically incompetent Governor Gruesome, the amount of fentanyl is apparently enough to “kill the global population nearly twice over.”
Ah, but it’s not enough for Newsom to end the “sanctuary status” that enables illegals to bring so many drugs in the first place.
It’s even more hilarious when a state effectively allows open intravenous drug use in the streets while simultaneously pulling out all the stops to control what people eat.
Then again, since everyone has to eat, controlling the food supply chain is an excellent way for authoritarians to amplify their power.
Indeed, the streets of San Francisco becoming a cosmic joke in light of the rampant drug abuse, which has been so prolific that several businesses have permanently shut their doors.
However, lawmakers, apparently unable to propose any solutions to deal with a truly deleterious situation with regards to homelessness and drug abuse (and overdoses) alike, have apparently decided to focus on the horrors of General Mills products instead.
Indeed, Democratic assemblymember Jesse Gabriel who is apparently always eager to introduce legislation regarding what individuals can and cannot eat, is now taking aim at none other than Lucky Charms and other childhood favorites.
Indeed, Gabriel’s proposal aims for banning seven ingredients found in cereals and chips like Lucky Charms, Cap’N Crunch, and Cheetos: Blue Dye No. 1, Blue Dye No. 2, Green Dye No. 3, Red Dye No. 40, Yellow Dye No. 5, Yellow Dye No. 6, and titanium dioxide.
If the bill is passed, then schools would be pressed to begin removing food items with these ingredients as soon as 2025.
Rather hilarious … Californians are more than free to purchase an array of drugs at their leisure, but they can’t eat a bowl of Lucky Charms. Right.
Gabriel also waged war on Skittles with the California Food Safety Act, which aimed four different ingredients: potassium bromate, propylparaben, brominated vegetable oil, and red dye No. 3.
According to Gabriel and other Democrats, these ingredients make it hard for students “to learn.”
“California has a responsibility to protect our students from chemicals that harm children and that can interfere with their ability to learn,” Gabriel insisted.
Is that so? Something suggests hormonal therapy for so-called gender transitioning would be much more destruction on students’ “ability to learn,” but such obvious observations rarely emanate from Democrat lawmakers.
“As a lawmaker, a parent, and someone who struggled with ADHD, I find it unacceptable that we allow schools to serve foods with additives that are linked to cancer, hyperactivity and neurobehavioral harms,” Gabriel continued.
That hyperactivity might also be attributed to the general lack of discipline embraced by this generation’s households, wherein children may well rule the roost more often than not.
Hilariously, Gabriel claims that public schools will play a role in safeguarding children’s health, despite the obvious damage caused to students’ health through their eagerness to aid and abet hormone-driven gender transitions.
“This bill will empower schools to better protect the health and wellbeing of our kids and encourage manufacturers to stop using these dangerous additives,” Gabriel concluded.
If only Gabriel were as passionate about hormonal therapy for 12-year-olds.
Not to mention passionately outspoken about fentanyl, which appears a tad more dangerous than sugary cereal.
Alas, Skittles are an easier target.
Unless, of course, the LGBTQ mob coopts them as some sort of symbol for their “movement.”
In such a case, Skittles would likely become enshrined as a sacred food in California legislation.
Author: Jane Jones
These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.
To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].
Family-Friendly Content
Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More
These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.
To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].
Family-Friendly Content
Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More
