In yet another hilarious instance of the left eating the left, former Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot has apparently been hired to investigate the mayor of Dolton, a city near to Chicago.
Either that, or the Democrats are merely hiring their own to serve as “investigators” in order to cover up what’s really going on.
Something must be in the air in Illinois, because it seems like quite a few cities in the state just cannot resist installing highly questionable leaders into positions of alleged public trust.
In this instance, self-proclaimed “Super Mayor” Tiffany Henyard has apparently not been “super” in fulfilling her obligations to the individuals she allegedly represents.
Indeed, Henyard has been accused of a series of rather unadmirable behavior.
For instance, Ms. “Super Mayor” has been accused of embezzling taxpayer funds.
Or, in other words, Henyard has been accused of misusing taxpayer funds exactly the same way that BLM misuses its “charitable donations.”
Henyard has apparently been accused of silencing victims of sexual assault for reasons unknown, going as far as to veto an allegation into the matter.
In essence, Henyard is the typical Democrat on a major power trip, though she lacks the intellect to cover up her misdeeds.
After all, it’s pretty bad when Henyard is going to be investigated by Lightfoot, of all people.
Safe to say that neither Lightfoot nor Henyard are the leaders the United States needs, as both have a deeply shady track record.
Henyard is accused of major league corruption, not to mention default narcissism with her “Super Mayor” moniker.
Lightfoot, on the other hand, has demonstrated open racism with impunity, yet she apparently is trustworthy enough to score a massively overly paid gig investigating yet another corrupt Democrat.
Someone else who, for all intents and purposes, probably isn’t much different from Lightfoot herself.
“I bring expertise in leading investigations of this kind and understand the complex challenges of governing. I will follow the facts where they lead, without bias, and reserve comments until the work is complete,” Lightfoot intoned.
Is that so?
Lightfoot sure wasn’t committed to an absence of bias when it came to interviewing reporters.
In fact, Lightfoot is notorious for openly stating that she refused to interview with any journalist who wasn’t a person of “color,” as she was apparently offended by the high number of non-white journalists in Chicago.
Apparently, Lightfoot was offended “by the overwhelming whiteness and maleness of Chicago media outlets, editorial boards, the political press corps, and yes, the City Hall press corps specifically.”
She should be more offended by the overwhelming flow of illegal migrants into Chicago, but that would be far too logical.
Another major downside to the entire “investigation” scenario is that Ms. Lightfoot is being paid a staggering $400 per hour for her “services” to the city.
That’s quite the hourly rate for a former public servant.
Then again, the same public servant also demanded major defunding of the Chicago Police Department … while she enjoyed private, taxpayer-funded security.
Lightfoot recently lost her most recent bid to be Chicago Mayor once again, blaming “racism,” rather than incompetence, for her ouster.
The “racism” claim falls even flatter considering that current Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson is also a black American.
To be fair to Lightfoot, however, “Brandon” is about as incompetent as she is.
Yet she’s somehow scored a $400 per hour, taxpayer-funded gig.
Rather ridiculous.
Though knowing Lightfoot, she’s probably secretly ranting about the “white privilege” Pelosi has experienced with her tens of millions of dollars’ worth of stock market gains, nearly all of which originate from insider knowledge.
Let the circular “firing squad” continue … to borrow a phrase from good old Obama.
Author: Ofelia Thornton
These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.
To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].
Family-Friendly Content
Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More
These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.
To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].
Family-Friendly Content
Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More
