It’s amazing how often the far left is busted for the exact same behavior that they accuse other Americans of doing.
It’s especially amazing when the left is busted for the exact same behavior that they accuse Trump of doing, even launching 90+ indictments against him.
And that would be none other than election interference.
Almost humorously, Trump may have 90+ indictments against him over so-called “election interference,” but it appears that the far left has been hard at work with so-called interference since at least 2008.
As detailed in a report from the Daily Mail, Google has interfered in elections at least “41 times” since at least 2008.
The Media Research Center (MRC), a conservative think tank, made the ghastly discover upon conducting an investigation into Google.
“MRC researchers have found 41 times where Google interfered in elections over the last 16 years … From the mouths of Google executives, the tech giant let slip what was never meant to be made public: That Google uses its ‘great strength and resources and reach’ to advance its leftist values,” MRC Free Speech America vice president Dan Schneider and editor Gabriela Pariseau chillingly observed.
Rather scary.
Even scarier is Google’s absurd defense, which claims that the report is filled with “baseless, inaccurate complaints that have been debunked by third parties.”
Right. After 50+ “intelligence” agents signed off on the so-called Russian interference with Biden’s laptops, which was later proved to be a lie, Google can hardly talk about any “baseless” accusations against it.
Moreover, Google has become even worse with its interference efforts through the launch of its so-called “Gemini” AI tool, which refuses to say anything negative about Biden.
Of course, it will spread disinformation until the sun goes down about Trump.
Frankly, it should come as no surprise that Google has been screwing around in politics since at least 2008.
After all, 2008 is also known as the year that none other than Mr. “Change” himself – Emperor Obama – was elected.
Is it any wonder, especially in hindsight, that the media oftentimes proudly proclaims that Obama is one of the first presidents to be elected following an impressive social media campaign?
Indeed, social media is oftentimes cited as one of the major reasons that Obama ultimately upset Clinton’s presidential ambitions, especially as he succeeded in brainwashing angry, entitled, and generally directionless youth with his “Change” agenda.
He brought about “change” all right – chiefly in the form of a blatant disregard for institutional principles and American values, not to mention setting up his “third term” in the future via the vice presidency of Biden.
Even more humorously, the same snowflakes that voted for Obama undoubtedly took part in “Occupy Wall Street” movements … only for none other than Obama himself to bail out the big banks and collect big checks from said banks upon leaving office.
As in a $400,000 check for delivering a ghostwritten speech to Goldman Sachs, big.
That said, $400,000 isn’t going to cover a real estate profile spanning from Hawaii to Martha’s Vineyard, which is estimated to be worth tens of millions of dollars.
Seems like a more appropriate real estate spread for a legit billionaire than a supposed “public servant,” but Obama clearly likes to bring change in everything he does.
After all, not even Pelosi has been that shameless in her own profiteering, and she at least spent decades in “public service” to make it a tad less obvious.
Obama, like most of the thugs that demand “reparations,” just can’t wait for anything.
Fortunately, the Supreme Court is set to make a decision on the degree to which government officials are permitted to interact with social media companies in the coming months.
One can only hope that the alarming report regarding Google’s 16-year election interference is considered.
Author: Jane Jones
These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.
To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].
Family-Friendly Content
Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More
These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.
To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].
Family-Friendly Content
Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More
