While the protests in LA continue to rage away, one thing has become quite clear – Soros is highly likely to have at minimum, peripheral involvement in the furor.
Either that, or someone aspiring to be Soros … and who has the deep pockets to pay protestors to “protest.”
“This is something that the Department of Justice and the FBI are looking into. Who is funding these protestors? We’ve seen the ads put up on Craigslist offering people thousands of dollars a week to go out and conduct these violent and dangerous riots,” Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard declared.
Soros certainly does come to mind, whether or not he is involved in this specific protest.
And, perhaps most troublingly of all, the “legacy” of Soros is highly likely to be continued by his ill-tempered son, who has been more renowned for his debauched Hamptons lifestyle than his social activism.
Just consider the rather troubling description of one of the world’s ostensibly wealthiest heirs: “In private he is brooding and cerebral and has a propensity for candor and bursts of hot-temperedness.”
Yikes.
And this is the description of an anarchist heir, no less.
Yet that’s exactly how Mr. Alex Soros has apparently – and surprisingly – been displayed in a recent New York Magazine profile.
That’s right: Alex Soros, otherwise known as the heir apparent to anarchist billionaire George Soros’s gargantuan fortune, is apparently a less-than-ideal candidate to carry forth the “anarchist” work of his father.
In a rather stunning report, Fox News has unveiled all the ways in which a recent New York Magazine profile of Alex Soros may well be a welcome alternative relative to his father, wannabe King George.
For starters, Mr. Alex Soros apparently cannot communicate very well, which is not much of a surprise.
After all, as he was born with an ill-begotten platinum spoon in his mouth, it should come as no great surprise that other people have long communicated for him.
“His halting, Peter Thiel–like baritone is full of ahs and ums, and his sentences can sound like records skipping, as if he were unable to easily put into language what is clear in his mind. This slightly tortured persona has invited comparisons with his elder half-brother Jonathan, who sprang from Harvard Law School and a federal clerkship to work alongside his father in finance and philanthropy,” the unflattering profile revealed.
Ah, how melodramatic.
The “tortured persona” of the son of a multibillionaire. How utterly authentic.
Hilariously, Fox News observed that the unfavorable portrayal of Alex Soros was heavily reliant upon insider information, illustrating the degree to which he is clearly not an ideal person to be around.
Some family insiders have allegedly referred to Alex Soros as the archetypal “prodigal son,” for instance.
Naturally, this “prodigal son” characterization is problematic if Alex Soros’s attention is allegedly supposed to be fixated on anti-Trump initiatives.
“Exactly how to push back against the [Trump] madness he leaves unclear. Nor does he offer any coherent agenda for the Democrats, whose roiling, inconclusive debates can seem personified by Alex himself. He was a regular presence at the Biden White House, one-half of an odd power couple, yet few in the broader political universe have a grasp of how he thinks about the world and plans to spend the wealth at his disposal,” the magazine profile fretted.
Well, thus far, Mr. Alex Soros has blown plenty on bimbos and parties, and probably quite a few carbon credits as well.
You know, for offsetting all of his private jet use.
“When Soros insiders try to explain the family dynamic, they draw on the standard texts of empire and heredity …,” a family insider attempted to explain.
Naturally, “standard texts” for typical politicians would include tweets and television shows.
And, sure enough, television shows provided the apparent reference for Mr. Alex Soros.
Hilariously, the television show cited by the so-called Soros “insider” was also a show that offended DEI militants.
Indeed, Succession was blasted for being a “flagrantly white” television show.
Some media outlets went as far as to blast Succession as a “white people safari.”
Thus, it’s rather amusing that Succession was the apparent “standard text” for Soros insiders.
“Roman is Alex,” a family insider insisted.
Or Alex Soros is Roman Roy.
Regardless, Roman has been aptly described as “cruel” and “manipulative,” as well as unfocused and completely incapable of running a business.
Likely an apt description of George Soros’s son.
In fact, that apparently is an apt description of Alex Soros, per a family insider.
“The real story is that every single person who knows the family knows that Alex was exactly the wrong person to lead the foundation,” the profile added.
Quite frankly, this article from New York Magazine may well be the most hopeful article to conservative Americans who are rather tired of Soros’s obviously funded “rallies” in favor of illegals, Hamas, and multiple other blatantly obvious causes du jour.
After all, if Alex Soros is the effective equivalent of Roman Roy of Succession, that would mean that George Soros is the effective equivalent of Logan Roy, the patriarch who founded the entire empire that warranted a familial succession, as suggested by the name of the show.
And, for those who have seen the show, it is rather clear that the comparison between Alex Soros and Roman Roy – from someone within the Soros camp, no less – is quite salient.
Not to mention encouraging.
After all, one can only hope that Alex Soros will allocate his billions towards elitist, invite-only parties, rather than continuous efforts to shred whatever integrity remains of the American border.
Author: Jane Jones
