Talk about unwittingly exposing one’s dead set intentions on dominating in 2028.
California Governor Gavin Newsom, oftentimes referred to as Governor Gruesome or Governor Newscam, is making his 2028 intentions rather clear.
However, unlike Comrade Kamala’s running mate, Tim Walz, who recently – and oddly – announced his interest in running for the presidency, Newsom is significantly sneakier in how he is going about his longstanding presidential ambitions.
And one of the clearest ways in which Newsom is being quite sneaky can be deduced from his gradual, and deliberately public, shift on varied party beliefs and policies.
Which is especially evident in his most recent, surprising shift on transgender militancy.
According to a report from the New York Post, Newsom has apparently decided to adopt a moderate approach to transgender militancy.
Naturally, “moderate” these days would be indisputably far left all of ten years ago, but that’s how quickly terrible public education combined with excessive social media can pollute much of public consciousness.
Anyway, per a report from the New York Post, Newsom recently sat down to have a discussion with “campus culture warrior” Charlie Kirk, a MAGA influencer, in which he proclaimed that transgender individuals competing against biological women is “a deeply unfair” development.
“I think it’s an issue of fairness; I completely agree with you on that. It is an issue of fairness – it’s deeply unfair,” Newsom proclaimed.
And, to make it clear that he was not being misquoted or taken out of context, Newsom also doubled down on his stance when expressing agreement with Kirk about transgender athletes.
“I am not wrestling with the fairness issue … I totally agree with you,” Newsom simpered in response to Kirk.
Amazingly, Newsom even admitted that his 13-year-old son listens to Kirk’s MAGA broadcast, and was quite excited that his father would be sitting down for a podcast interview with him.
Needless to say, that’s quite the shift from quite a few other avowed transgender militants in the Democrat Party.
Newsom’s sudden shift on transgender militancy certainly stands in stark contrast to the varied ways in which his Democrat colleagues have opted to “resist” Trump.
Lately, quite a few Democrats at the federal, state, and local level have bulldozed straight ahead in their pitiable “resistance” of Trump.
For instance, several Democrat representatives were demonstrating their “resistance” against Trump during his recent address to Congress.
In fact, one of the representatives – Rep. Al Green – ended up censured for his repeatedly heckling of Trump and refusal to maintain basic “decorum.”
Even ten Democrats sided with Republicans when admitting that Green was out of line.
At the state and local level, many Democrat leaders have openly proclaimed their intention to resist Trump’s sweeping mass deportation efforts.
Naturally DEI Chicago Mayor “Brandon” Johnson is one of the biggest loudmouths of all, followed closely by DEI Boston Mayor Michelle Wu, perhaps best known for her anti-White people Christmas parties.
Yes, in light of these other Democrats’ ridiculousness, Newsom certainly does come across as more “moderate” with the latest announcement on his startling shift on transgender militancy.
Then again, lest individuals forget, it was only about a week or so ago that Hollywood legend Mel Gibson openly backed another recall effort for Newsom.
While the first recall effort was due to his arguable, albeit temporary, tyranny during the COVID pandemic, the second recall was due to his apparent incompetence during the recent wildfires that ravaged Los Angeles.
Yes, in light of these facts, Newsom’s sudden, deliberately publicized position on transgender militancy is a rather convenient approach to repurpose his public image as an apparent moderate.
However, history is chockfull of examples of Newsom’s clear desire for presidential power, particularly when he campaigned for “Biden” without Biden present … which, in reality, was little more than a clear campaign for himself.
Will Newsom succeed in persuading the public he is fit for the presidency?
Time remains to tell, but he sure is acting as though that’s his future intention.
Author: Ofelia Thornton
