Comrade Kamala’s ultimately failed campaign was riddled with several challenges, starting with her rather undemocratic ascension to the top of the presidential ticket in the first place.
And the ease with which she soared to the top, purely on the basis of her DEI identity, is no doubt why she arrogantly – and unwisely – demonstrated cold arrogance towards the individuals who have long driven the Democrat base.
Including major union bosses, such as the Teamsters union boss, Sean O’Brien, who delivered a surprisingly passionate performance at the Republican National Convention.
Even more surprisingly, Teamsters officially declined to endorse anyone for the presidency in 2024, a move that the union had not made in decades.
Nearly two months after the election, however, Teamsters is now detailing precisely why Comrade Kamala lost the election in such an epic fashion, starting with her extreme arrogance.
After all, what candidate declares an imminent election victory, with or without the endorsement of the Teamsters?
Comrade Kamala, that’s who.
And her arrogance is precisely what O’Brien recalled in a recent interview, in which he notes Harris’s exceedingly poor treatment of him.
According to a rather humorous report from the New York Post, “Vice President Kamala Harris stormed out of a meeting with powerful Teamsters President Sean O’Brien while campaigning, arrogantly telling him she didn’t need his support because she’d ‘win with you or without you’ – just before her crushing loss to Donald Trump.”
Way to make a memorable impression, Ms. Kamala.
Indeed, O’Brien recalled quite a bit while making a recent appearance on “The Tucker Carlson Show,” further underscoring the degree to which the left is driving all of its (former) base into Trump’s camp.
For starters, O’Brien noted that Comrade Kamala answered a grand total of four questions for the Teamsters – as opposed to President-elect Donald Trump, who answered all sixteen questions for the union.
O’Brien recalled how Comrade Kamala received a note by the time of her fourth question, which declared “this will be the last question.”
So, rather than answering all of O’Brien’s questions, Harris answered a grand total of 25 percent of the questions he had in store, storming out twenty minutes early to boot.
As she stormed out, Harris apparently proclaimed that she would be wining the election “with or without” O’Brien’s help.
“And her declaration of the way out was, ‘I’m going to win with you or without you,’” O’Brien noted in his discussion with Carlson.
Clearly not.
O’Brien certainly didn’t mince words about her arrogance, noting, “Damn. I thought I was arrogant. That’s really arrogant.”
Indeed, it is.
In fact, Comrade Kamala was so arrogant that O’Brien actually reached out to the Biden administration, specifically former Secretary of Labor Marty Walsh, to inquire about the source of Harris’ extreme arrogance.
“Let me ask you a question, Marty. Excuse my French. Who does this f–king lady think she is?” O’Brien asked.
Apparently, a lady that can blow through more than $1.5B and still end up in debt … all of two months later.
Apparently, a lady that thinks feelings, rather than policies, win elections.
And, most of all, apparently a lady that believes her DEI identity alone will be enough to sway elections.
Hint: It won’t.
Author: Jane Jones
