You know the Dems are getting desperate if they decide that trotting out Stacey Abrams is a good idea.
After all, Abrams, is notorious for endlessly contesting her losses in Georgia in 2018, engaging in the exact same behavior that the Dems excoriated Trump for.
The difference, of course, is that Trump (and many others) questioned the results of a national election, in which several different states counted votes in suspect ways amid the COVID pandemic … whereas Abrams went to war with one state, during non-pandemic times.
And boy, did she ever go to war.
Just consider her remarks in 2018.
“I have never denied that I lost. I don’t live in the governor’s mansion; I would have noticed,” Abrams raged.
… And in 2019.
“We had this little election back in 2018. And despite the final tally and the inauguration and the situation we find ourselves in, I do have one very affirmative statement to make. We won,” Abrams roared.
Well then. The model of stability, right there.
And the Dems have decided to trot that model out, big time, in a lame effort to browbeat voters into voting for the indefensible.
As Abrams is actually claiming that men are supposedly not voting for Comrade Kamala due to being “sexist.”
As reported by the Daily Wire, Abrams fell back on her predictable DEI bag of tricks, proclaiming that gender is an apparent factor affecting Kamala’s election chances.
“I know it’s a shock to everyone, but sexism remains real and a very pertinent issue,” Abrams ranted.
Is that so? Seems that the Dems want to abolish gender entirely, so how in the world is sexism suddenly “a very pertinent issue?”
Abrams also claimed that Harris is supposedly doing “very well with black men” – a point that Obama does not appear to agree with – though she proceeded to bizarrely claim that “racism” and “sexism” from Black men were impacting Comrade Kamala’s chances.
“However, we do have to acknowledge that there is sexism. There is racism,” Abrams brayed.
Well, Ms. Abrams, we do have to acknowledge the potential for World War III as well. Just food for thought …
“There are challenges in our electorate and that’s why it’s so important that Kamala Harris is going everywhere and talking to everyone. She respects voters. She meets them where they are and she refuses to be told that she has lost a cohort, lost a community simply because she’s different,” Abrams boomed.
Get real, Abrams. What an obviously paid shill.
A poor complement to none other than Emperor Obama, who has issued his own absurd commands to an electorate he’s long since abandoned for the ultra-rich enclaves inhabited by Pelosi, Clinton, and other similar types.
“My understanding, based on reports I’m getting from campaigns and communities, is that we have not yet seen the same kinds of energy and turnout in all quarters of our neighborhoods and communities as we saw when I was running,” Obama boomed.
Gee, Obama, you think? Perhaps people are tired of being lied to?
Per Emperor Obama, the supposedly insufficient enthusiasm for Ms. Harris “seems to be more pronounced with the brothers.”
“You’re coming up with all kinds of reasons and excuses, I’ve got a problem with that,” Obama huffed.
Uh huh.
Better watch out, everyone – Obama has a problem!
… With anything threatening his already decimated “legacy,” that is.
In an additionally idiotic move, ultra-privileged Obama proceeded to lecture multiple Black American men – several of whom have been disregarded in favor of illegals, including within Obama’s hometown of Chicago – about why they need to “feel” the idea of a female president.
“Because part of it makes me think – and I’m speaking to men directly – part of it makes me think that, well, you just aren’t feeling the idea of having a woman as president, and you’re coming up with other alternatives and other reasons for that,” Obama declared.
Oh, yes.
Because elections should be all about “feelings.”
What a persuasive political argument … not.
Yet Obama kept on playing on the supposed “feelings” that Comrade Kamala is supposed to inspire.
“On the one hand, you have somebody who grew up like you, knows you, went to college with you, understands the struggles and pain and joy that comes from those experiences … And on the other side, you have someone who has consistently shown disregard, not just for the communities, but for you as a person,” Obama declared.
In other words, “on the other side,” Obama spreads mass disinformation regarding Trump, then wonders why voters appear to favor him.
Most hilariously of all, Obama actually had the gall to claim that Kamala should be president since “women” hold up the spine of the nation … despite the fact that the Dems are actively attempting to destroy the very idea of a woman in the first place.
“Women in our lives have been getting our backs this entire time. When we get in trouble and the system isn’t working for us, they’re the ones out there marching and protesting,” Obama brayed.
Only for men to later claim they’re “women” to reap all the benefits of male and female privilege.
The kind of nonsense that Comrade Kamala supports … and the kind of support that deeply alienates her from Americans that really aren’t into reinventing the entirety of humanity via sex changes.
And the alienation is resplendent throughout the humorous comments on the Daily Wire article, most of which firmly disagreed with Obama’s declaration that anti-Kamala Black men are supposedly “racist” or “sexist.”
“They are not racist, not sexist, just smart,” one commenter drolly remarked.
Indeed.
Author: Jane Jones
