Big Tech Unwittingly Hands Trump Potential Mistrial Victory

There are advantages to the Dems’ total corruption of public education after all.

As that education surely does not foster substantial critical thinking skills, especially amongst the woke.

As reported by The Blaze, it looks like a Trump “juror” may well have blown the entire case, courtesy of a post on Facebook.

Which appeared about 24 hours before the ultra-predictable verdict.

Facebook user Michael Anderson posted his delight upon learning Trump was set to be convicted … a day before the “verdict” was announced.

“Thank you for all your hard against the MAGA crazies!” Anderson declared.

Interesting definition of “hard work,” considering the New Yorker jurors already predetermined the outcome without hearing any real evidence one way or the other.

Moreover, it is funny that MAGA is apparently “crazy,” yet Anderson publicly posts a statement that could lead to a full-blown mistrial.

Which is evident in Anderson’s continued public commentary on the social media platform.

“My cousin is a juror on Trumps criminal case and they’re going to convict him tomorrow according to her. Thank you 🙏 New York courts!!!! ❤️” Anderson brayed.

Is that so? Well, clearly your cousin hasn’t learned a darn thing about not saying a word about an ongoing trial.

Facebook user Lopsided FreeSpeech responded to Anderson’s rather interesting post, making it clear that Anderson’s cousin egregiously violated their duties as a juror, assuming Anderson is relaying the truth of his experience.

“Well you just implicated your cousin in a crime if what you say is true. It is against the law for a juror to discuss the case before it has ended. Thank you for shedding light on your cousin’s actions,” the Facebook user drawled.

Indeed. Yet another piece of evidence regarding Biden’s kangaroo courts.

For that matter, why was the jury not sequestered in a case this substantial? Seems suspect.

After all, if the jury had been sequestered, such a Facebook post could have been easily disproven.

But since they weren’t sequestered, now the entire post is in question.

It certainly got the corrupt judge’s attention, when he wasn’t busy kicking back with martinis with the Dems.

“Dear Counsel: Today, the Court became aware of a comment that was posted on the Unified Court System’s public Facebook page and which I now bring to your attention,” Merchan declared.

Well, Merchan, it was already brought to the nation’s attention, but thanks for your so-called concern for fairness now.

More like concern over a mistrial.

“The comment, now labeled as one week old, responded to a routine UCS notice, posted on May 29, 2024, regarding oral arguments in the Fourth Department of the Appellate Division unrelated to this proceeding …

The posting, entitled ‘The Appellate Division, Fourth Department, will hear oral arguments this morning at 10,’ and the comment are both viewable at https://www.facebook.com/NewYorkCourts/,” Merchan added.

And? The bottom line is the post appeared 24 hours before the verdict was declared.

And, as the verdict was guilty, then it’s pretty clear that the post needs to be looked into … at minimum, the post exposes how totally predictable the corrupt conclusion of the trial truly was.

“As appropriate, the Court informed the parties once it learned of this online content,” Al Baker, a spokesperson for the New York State Unified Court System informed Business Insider.

Uh huh. Like the Merchan-led “Court” cares at all about basic propriety.

Neama Rahmani, a former federal prosecutor also tried to downplay the explosive social media post.

“A stray comment on social media is not enough for a new trial … But if the defense can get a declaration from a juror that they discussed the case with family members, then Judge Merchan would hold an evidentiary hearing to examine the juror to determine whether the improper influence and prejudice took place.  I don’t think a statement from the family member is enough if it’s not supported by a juror affidavit,” Rahmani declared.

Yeah. Because such an affidavit would really be persuasive, given jurors’ clear disregard for basic evidence and court proceedings.

All they wanted to do was “get Trump.”

In exchange, they may well have let Trump free on a social media technicality following all of their apparent inability to keep their mouths shut about such a crucial trial.

Eventually, all rot comes to the surface.

Author: Ofelia Thornton


Most Popular

These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More



Most Popular
Sponsored Content

These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More