BLM may have faded in media prominence ever since its rampant thievery came to the media’s attention, though its horrific objectives apparently remain embedded in ultra-woke politicians’ minds.
And, horrifyingly, those objectives extend well beyond stirring up senseless racial tension … they also include total destruction of the nuclear family, or a family with a mother, father, and a child or children.
And that total destruction is reaching yet another ugly apex in the grand old state of California.
That’s right: In the spirit of Washington state, which appears to routinely compete with California and Oregon in terms of ultra-leftism, lawmakers across the not-so-golden state are proposing the removal of children from parents who refuse to “affirm” their children’s gender.
That’s right: If a 6-year-old boy declares he is a female, or vice versa, and the parents refuse to “affirm” such declarations, apparently California lawmakers believe that such children should be removed from “abusive” households, stat.
Needless to say, of all the asinine laws and/or policies to emerge from the state, including zero-bail policies, sanctuary cities, and open drug abuse in massive homeless encampments, threatening to remove children from parents and putting them under control of the state presents a horrifying new level of authoritarianism and societal destruction, to put it mildly.
Which is exactly what ultra-globalist, ultra-anti-American interests underlying Biden’s presidency want.
Indeed, as reported by the Daily Mail, AB957, which has been proposed by Democratic Assemblymember Lori Wilson and state Senator Scott Wiener, apparently aims to amend the approved state Family Code that emphasizes the alleged “health, safety, and welfare of the child” in every household.
Rather ironic, considering the state does very little to address the “health, safety, and welfare” of all of its law-abiding, tax-paying citizens.
As noted by the same outlet, “if passed, the law could see children pulled from their parents’ home if their family members have what the state deems anti-LGBTQ+ ideals.”
That’s nice. Something suggests that removing children from parents who actually love them is hardly in the “best interests” of society, but it is certainly in the best interests of those who detest traditional, nuclear families.
“We should be affirming our children in every possible way,” Wilson blared, claiming that the affirmation of a children’s gender is apparently in the “best interests” of the child, surgery and whatnot included.
Rather clearly, Ms. Wilson chooses to ignore children that grew out of their confusion and have deeply regretted initiating a transition in the first place.
Nicole Peterson, who is the founder of Facts Law Truth Justice, is also properly horrified by the legislation, especially as the law doesn’t even bother setting any age limits whatsoever, meaning that a 5-year-old apparently should be removed if parents refuse to “affirm” their “real gender.”
After being urged to transition by woke teachers first, of course.
“If a parent or guardian is unwilling or simply not ready to affirm their 7-year-old’s new identity – as they transition from Spongebob to Batman to Dora the Explorer – they can be found guilty of child abuse under AB-957 if it passes into law,” Peterson stated.
Scary, to put it very mildly.
Numerous commenters, including from the United Kingdom, were properly horrified by the bill proposal.
As succinctly stated by one individual, “America is truly insane. And this poisin is spreading here.”
What happens when children choose to identify as drug addicts?
Oh, that’s right: California already has drug-filled, “legal” encampments for precisely that purpose.
Author: Jane Jones