A new bill, which astonishingly insists upon banning the use of police dogs, is apparently being entertained alongside absurdly out of touch “reparations” in none other than the rapidly communist state of California.
That’s right: Now dogs are apparently racist.
Democrats truly have gone to the dogs with this one (pun intended).
Either that, or they have called everyone else a racist so many times that they apparently have to start labeling other species as “racist” to drum up outrage again.
“The use of police canines has been a mainstay in this country’s dehumanizing, cruel, and violent abuse of Black Americans and people of color for centuries,” AB 742 dramatically began.
What happened to non-emotive language in legal proceedings? Wouldn’t the excess of adjectives be more appropriate in a fictional novel?
Then again, the excess of adjectives is precisely what permits feelings to serve as a substitute for facts in the Dems’ world.
“First used by slave catchers, police canines are a violent carry-over from America’s dark past. In recent decades, they have been used in brutal attempts to quell the Civil Rights Movement, the LA Race Riots, and in response to Black Lives Matter protests,” the bill continued.
Of course, the bill took exactly zero note of the fact that many events, in particular the race riots and BLM “protests” were indeed laden with violence themselves.
Seems the only thing the bill is intent on doing is abolishing the use of police dogs, all because dogs are apparently racist alongside cops, per the Dems’ definitions.
And more than one ultra-liberal apparently thinks it’s just fine that police dogs should be banned, regardless of how vital they are for detecting drugs, bombs, and a number of other items that are crucial for law enforcement to address.
Dems sure didn’t seem to protest the use of dogs in the War on Terror and other major conflicts in American history, either, but they also used to steer clear of BLM as well.
Until they realized how useful militant BLM members could be.
According to Carlos Marquez III of ACLU California, however, police dogs are apparently not only racist, but their bites apparently impact “communities of color” more than anyone else.
“The use of police canines has severe and potentially deadly consequences for bite victims, especially communities of color,” Marquez proclaimed.
Ridiculous. So, in other words, “communities of color” will apparently suffer worse consequences from dog bites than others.
In what universe does that make any remote sense? Exactly why would a person of color suffer vastly greater physical consequences from a dog bite than someone else?
Tragically, loads of snowflakes would likely eat this nonsense up.
“This bill sets a new standard for California and marks an important step in ending this inhumane practice,” Marquez added coolly.
Uh, how about the inhumanity of ever-rising crime, most of which is highly violent in nature?
How about the inhumanity of loads of Walgreens and other necessary stores closing, making it all the more difficult for vulnerable individuals to receive pharmaceutical medication in a timely manner?
How about the inhumanity of shutting down churches, schools, and other vital institutions throughout the pandemic?
But hey, by all means, continue barking down the increasingly pitiable lane while attacking “racist dogs” … While society continues to deteriorate.
Author: Jane Jones